Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Ethics Education filter Ethics Education
- (-) Remove Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter Justice Tech Entrepreneurs
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for [2015-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z], Self-Represented Litigation Network, Research, Justice Tech Entrepreneurs, 100% Access to Justice, Ethics Education
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...