Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Best Practices filter Best Practices
- (-) Remove Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- (-) Remove Strategic Planning filter Strategic Planning
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- General Non-Profit Resources for Planning and Evaluation (1) Apply General Non-Profit Resources for Planning and Evaluation filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Managing a Self-Help Center (1) Apply Managing a Self-Help Center filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Self-Help Centers (1) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services (1) Apply Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (1) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 2 of 2 for [2015-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z], 100% Access to Justice, Strategic Planning, Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys, Research, Best Practices
Search results
SRLN Brief: Communications Resources (SRLN 2015)
A communications strategy, which is central to any project's success, not only charts communications with internal and external customers, but also serves as an important driver for the metrics collected to measure success. Voices for Civil Justice h ...
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...