Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter Justice Tech Entrepreneurs
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (3) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Working Groups (3) Apply Working Groups filter
- Best Practices (2) Apply Best Practices filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (2) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (1) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Courts (1) Apply Courts filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Integration with Institutional Process (1) Apply Integration with Institutional Process filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports (1) Apply Reports filter
- Self-Help Centers (1) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (1) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Technology (1) Apply Technology filter
- Triage & Service Portal (1) Apply Triage & Service Portal filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (1) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
State
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Search results
Report: Building A Litigant Portal: Business and Technical Requirements (NCSC 2015)
With funding from State Justice Institute, Thomas Clarke of the National Center for State Courts assembled two advisory committees – one to develop the business requirements for a litigant portal, and another to examine the technical requirements necessar ...
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
Best Practices: Best Practices in Court-Based Programs for the Self-Represented: Concepts, Attributes, Issues for Exploration, Examples, Contacts, and Resources (SRLN 2008)
This document, now in its second version, summarizes forty-two best practices in court based self-help service innovation, with descriptions of each practice, suggested attributes, examples and contacts. Recommended Citation, The Self-Represented Litiga ...