Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
- (-) Remove Working Groups filter Working Groups
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (5) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Research (5) Apply Research filter
- Courts (3) Apply Courts filter
- Reports (3) Apply Reports filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (3) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Best Practices (2) Apply Best Practices filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (2) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Regulatory Concerns (2) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Self-Help Centers (2) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Technology (2) Apply Technology filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (1) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Funding (1) Apply Funding filter
- Funding Strategies (1) Apply Funding Strategies filter
- Integration with Institutional Process (1) Apply Integration with Institutional Process filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (1) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Triage & Service Portal (1) Apply Triage & Service Portal filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (1) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
State
Tags
Post date
Search results
Report: Building A Litigant Portal: Business and Technical Requirements (NCSC 2015)
With funding from State Justice Institute, Thomas Clarke of the National Center for State Courts assembled two advisory committees – one to develop the business requirements for a litigant portal, and another to examine the technical requirements necessar ...
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
Report: Remote Appearances of Parties, Attorneys and Witnesses, A Review of Current Court Rules and Practices (SRLN 2017)
The Remote Appearances of Parties, Attorneys and Witnesses, A Review of Current Court Rules and Practices report is a follow up report to Serving Self-Represented Litigants Remotely – A Resource Guide. It "presents the author’s conclusions about the ...
Best Practices: Best Practices in Court-Based Programs for the Self-Represented: Concepts, Attributes, Issues for Exploration, Examples, Contacts, and Resources (SRLN 2008)
This document, now in its second version, summarizes forty-two best practices in court based self-help service innovation, with descriptions of each practice, suggested attributes, examples and contacts. Recommended Citation, The Self-Represented Litiga ...
Resource: Title IV-D Funding Resource Guide (SRLN 2014, revised 2017)
Many state court systems and individual courts take advantage of federal funding under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act to obtain reimbursement for the costs of adjudicating child support and paternity matters when hearings are handled by persons oth ...