Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency
- (-) Remove Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
- 100% Access to Justice (2) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Research (2) Apply Research filter
- Administrative Agencies (1) Apply Administrative Agencies filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports (1) Apply Reports filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 2 of 2 for 2015, Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency, Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
Article: A Restorative Adjudication Process Shows Promise (Teryl 2015)
In 2012, the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission initiated a project to integrate restorative justice principles into an administrative agency. Early research showed that when restorative justice principles guided the agency's changes, access to just ...