Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Best Practices filter Best Practices
- (-) Remove Judicial Ethics filter Judicial Ethics
- Ethics Education (2) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (2) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (2) Apply Research filter
- 100% Access to Justice (1) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Presentations (1) Apply Presentations filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Trainer of the Trainer Materials / Curricula (1) Apply Trainer of the Trainer Materials / Curricula filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 2 of 2 for Self-Represented Litigation Network, Judicial Ethics, Best Practices
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
Research: Judge- SRL Communications Research (SRLN 2007)
Through funding from the State Justice Institute, the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Maryland Judiciary, the Self-Represented Litigation Network conducted two research projects this year (2006-2007). These projects are: 1) Courtro ...