Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Judges filter Judges
- (-) Remove Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter Justice Tech Entrepreneurs
- (-) Remove Regulatory Concerns filter Regulatory Concerns
- 100% Access to Justice (1) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (1) Apply Research filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for Justice Tech Entrepreneurs, Judges, Regulatory Concerns
Search results
![SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015) SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)](https://www.srln.org/sites/default/files/styles/listing_image/public/images/1logo_2srln_0.jpg?itok=DIzF9Hgg)
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...