Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Ethics Education filter Ethics Education
- 100% Access to Justice (3) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Attorney Ethics (2) Apply Attorney Ethics filter
- Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics (2) Apply Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics filter
- Courts (2) Apply Courts filter
- Legal Aid (2) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Private Bar (2) Apply Private Bar filter
- Self-Help Centers (2) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Strategic Planning (2) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Law Libraries (1) Apply Law Libraries filter
- Libraries (1) Apply Libraries filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (1) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (1) Apply Research filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (1) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Unbundling (1) Apply Unbundling filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Search results
SRLN Brief: Law Library Ethics
The following are resources on law library ethics: American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) Ethical Principles & AALL UPL Toolkit The American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) Ethical Principles make a statement about law librarians’ duty to av ...
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
SRLN Brief: Rule 6.5- A Powerful Tool to Diversify Pro Bono and Transform Court Services (SRLN 2015)
Ethics rule 6.5 is a powerful tool to diversify pro bono programs and to transform court services because it allows unbundled lawyers to perform real time services in court-annexed programs without the onerous clerical burdens and limitations under the tr ...
SRLN Brief: Integrating Unbundling into Self-Help Services (SRLN 2015)
The states vary tremendously on how they may have integrated unbundling into their service delivery systems. Unbundling is a critical link to devloping a local ecosystem that supports 100% access to justice, and therefore should be a priority area for dev ...