Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Working Groups filter Working Groups
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (2) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- 100% Access to Justice (1) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Funding (1) Apply Funding filter
- Funding Strategies (1) Apply Funding Strategies filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (1) Apply Research filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 2 of 2 for Self-Represented Litigation Network, Working Groups, 2015
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
SRLN Brief: Funding (SRLN 2015)
Funding for SRL services comes from a variety of sources, including: state and local government appropriations; federal funding including VAWA for cases involving domestic violence, Title IV-D funds for cases involving child support, and a number of o ...