Document Author
Topic
- (-) Remove Ethics Education filter Ethics Education
- (-) Remove Judicial Ethics filter Judicial Ethics
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (3) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- 100% Access to Justice (2) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Best Practices (2) Apply Best Practices filter
- Judges (2) Apply Judges filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Presentations (1) Apply Presentations filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports (1) Apply Reports filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Trainer of the Trainer Materials / Curricula (1) Apply Trainer of the Trainer Materials / Curricula filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Search results
Report: NCSC Judicial Conduct Reporter (Gray 2014)
This issue of the Judicial Conduct Reporter includes an indepth look at how states are addressing the ethics issues posed by self-represented litigants, including a review of case law and Judicial Code of Ethics 2.2. 2.2 Judges Reports Judicial Ethics Uni ...
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
Research: Judge- SRL Communications Research (SRLN 2007)
Through funding from the State Justice Institute, the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Maryland Judiciary, the Self-Represented Litigation Network conducted two research projects this year (2006-2007). These projects are: 1) Courtro ...