Document Author
Topic
- (-) Remove Human Centered Design filter Human Centered Design
- (-) Remove Surveys filter Surveys
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (3) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (3) Apply Research filter
- 100% Access to Justice (2) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Reports (2) Apply Reports filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Online Dispute Resolution (1) Apply Online Dispute Resolution filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Technology (1) Apply Technology filter
- Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services (1) Apply Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services filter
Tags
Post date
Search results
Report: National Self‐Represented Litigants Project: Identifying and Meeting the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants (Julie Macfarlane 2013)
The following is the National Self‐Represented Litigants Project: Identifying and Meeting the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants Final Report Executive Summary – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Part 1: The study 1. Methodology The goal of this qualitative study w ...
Report: Cases Without Counsel: Experiences of Self-Representation in U.S. Family Court (IAALS 2016)
The following excerpt introduces the report: Cases Without Counsel: Experiences of Self-Representation in U.S. Family Court (“Cases Without Counsel” or “CWC”) is a qualitative empirical research study exploring the issue of self-representation in the Unit ...
Evaluation: The Utah Online Dispute Resolution Platform: A Usability Evaluation and Report (i4J Program 2020)
The Utah Online Dispute Resolution Platform: A Usability Evaluation and Report was published by the Innovation for Justice (i4j) Program at the University of Arizona School of Law, led by Professor Stacy Butler. The following is the report's executiv ...