Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Best Practices filter Best Practices
- (-) Remove Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency
- (-) Remove Regulatory Concerns filter Regulatory Concerns
- (-) Remove Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- (-) Remove Working Groups filter Working Groups
- 100% Access to Justice (1) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
State
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for [2015-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z], Best Practices, United States, Self-Represented Litigation Network, Research, Regulatory Concerns, Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys, Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency, 2015, Working Groups
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...