Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter Justice Tech Entrepreneurs
- (-) Remove Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- 100% Access to Justice (2) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Working Groups (2) Apply Working Groups filter
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Courts (1) Apply Courts filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports (1) Apply Reports filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (1) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Technology (1) Apply Technology filter
- Triage & Service Portal (1) Apply Triage & Service Portal filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 2 of 2 for Research, [2015-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z], Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys, Justice Tech Entrepreneurs, 2015
Search results
Report: Building A Litigant Portal: Business and Technical Requirements (NCSC 2015)
With funding from State Justice Institute, Thomas Clarke of the National Center for State Courts assembled two advisory committees – one to develop the business requirements for a litigant portal, and another to examine the technical requirements necessar ...
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...