Document Author
Topic
- (-) Remove Forms filter Forms
- (-) Remove Reports filter Reports
- (-) Remove Self-Help Centers filter Self-Help Centers
- 100% Access to Justice (3) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (3) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (3) Apply Research filter
- Forms (2) Apply Forms filter
- Simplification (2) Apply Simplification filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (2) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Allied Professionals (1) Apply Allied Professionals filter
- Automated Forms & E-Filing (1) Apply Automated Forms & E-Filing filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (1) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Courts (1) Apply Courts filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (1) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Plain Language (1) Apply Plain Language filter
- Plain Language & LEP (1) Apply Plain Language & LEP filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
Tags
Post date
Search results
Report: Resources to Assist Self-Represented Litigants: A Fifty State Review of the State of the Art (Greacen 2011)
This report was originally commissioned by the Michigan State Bar Foundation to assist Michigan’s Solutions on Self-Help (SOS) Task Force, but modified to serve as a national resource so that it may be of value to other jurisdictions working to enhance su ...
Report: Making Self-Help Work: Bet Tzedek’s Conservatorship Clinic (Bet Tzedek 2013)
Since 2007, Bet Tzedek Legal Services has been running a self-help conservatorship clinic in partnership with the Los Angeles Superior Court. Originally designed to serve 150 self-represented litigants per year, the program served more than 1,400 self-re ...
Report: A Comparative Readability Study of Plain Language Court Forms (Mindlin 2012)
This article presents the results from the first quantitative readability study of plain language court forms in the United States. Sixty citizens on a jury panel were selected to respond to brief questionnaires that tested relative comprehension of plain ...