Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys
- Research (6) Apply Research filter
- 100% Access to Justice (5) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (4) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Self-Help Centers (4) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Best Practices (3) Apply Best Practices filter
- Reports (3) Apply Reports filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (3) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Working Groups (3) Apply Working Groups filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (2) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Courts (2) Apply Courts filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (2) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Libraries (2) Apply Libraries filter
- Regulatory Concerns (2) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (2) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Strategic Planning (2) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Administrative Agencies (1) Apply Administrative Agencies filter
- Allied Professionals (1) Apply Allied Professionals filter
- Automated Forms & E-Filing (1) Apply Automated Forms & E-Filing filter
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Forms (1) Apply Forms filter
- Funding (1) Apply Funding filter
- Funding Strategies (1) Apply Funding Strategies filter
- Integration with Institutional Process (1) Apply Integration with Institutional Process filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Law Libraries (1) Apply Law Libraries filter
- Legal Aid (1) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (1) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Remote (1) Apply Remote filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (1) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Surveys (1) Apply Surveys filter
- Technology (1) Apply Technology filter
- Unbundling (1) Apply Unbundling filter
State
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...
Best Practices: Best Practices in Court-Based Programs for the Self-Represented: Concepts, Attributes, Issues for Exploration, Examples, Contacts, and Resources (SRLN 2008)
This document, now in its second version, summarizes forty-two best practices in court based self-help service innovation, with descriptions of each practice, suggested attributes, examples and contacts. Recommended Citation, The Self-Represented Litiga ...
Best Practices: Best Practices in E-Filing (LSC & SRLN 2013)
This document, the preparation of which was funded by the Legal Services Corporation through a grant to Central Minnesota Legal Services, was developed in close collaboration with SRLN. It explores a variety of principles and practices in areas from fee w ...
Resource: Title IV-D Funding Resource Guide (SRLN 2014, revised 2017)
Many state court systems and individual courts take advantage of federal funding under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act to obtain reimbursement for the costs of adjudicating child support and paternity matters when hearings are handled by persons oth ...
Survey: SRLN Library Working Group National Self-Help in Libraries Survey (SRLN 2013)
The Law Librarians’ Working Group of the Self-Represented Litigation Network surveyed law libraries in the summer of 2013 about their services, including self-help programs. The full survey results are available below, as well as maps of the various tiers ...
Resource: Resource Guide on Serving Self-Represented Litigants Remotely (SRLN 2016)
The Resource Guide provides options for courts and other entities interested in providing services to self-represented litigants using means that are not face-to-face, instead of, or in addition to, in-person alternatives such as walk-in services, worksho ...