Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Ethics Education filter Ethics Education
- (-) Remove Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency
- (-) Remove Judges filter Judges
- (-) Remove Judicial Ethics filter Judicial Ethics
- Best Practices (1) Apply Best Practices filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (1) Apply Research filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for [2015-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z], Judicial Ethics, Ethics Education, Judges, 100% Access to Justice, United States, Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...