Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- (-) Remove Best Practices filter Best Practices
- (-) Remove Judicial Ethics filter Judicial Ethics
- (-) Remove Research filter Research
- (-) Remove Strategic Planning filter Strategic Planning
- Ethics Education (1) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Judges (1) Apply Judges filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (1) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for [2015-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z], Best Practices, United States, Self-Represented Litigation Network, Research, Judicial Ethics, Strategic Planning, 100% Access to Justice
Search results
SRLN Brief: Procedural Fairness / Procedural Justice (SRLN 2015)
Research has shown that when defendants and litigants perceive the court process to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of whether they “win” or “lose” their case. This is called procedural ...