Document Author
Year Published
- 2015 (29) Apply 2015 filter
- 2013 (18) Apply 2013 filter
- 2016 (18) Apply 2016 filter
- 2021 (13) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (11) Apply 2020 filter
- 2014 (10) Apply 2014 filter
- 2017 (8) Apply 2017 filter
- 2018 (8) Apply 2018 filter
- 2011 (6) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (5) Apply 2010 filter
- 2012 (5) Apply 2012 filter
- 2003 (4) Apply 2003 filter
- 2005 (4) Apply 2005 filter
- 2007 (4) Apply 2007 filter
- 2008 (4) Apply 2008 filter
- 2009 (3) Apply 2009 filter
- 2000 (2) Apply 2000 filter
- 2004 (2) Apply 2004 filter
- 2019 (2) Apply 2019 filter
- 1975 (1) Apply 1975 filter
- 1988 (1) Apply 1988 filter
- 1995 (1) Apply 1995 filter
- 1999 (1) Apply 1999 filter
- 2002 (1) Apply 2002 filter
- 2014; 2017 (1) Apply 2014; 2017 filter
- 2023 (1) Apply 2023 filter
- SRLN (1) Apply SRLN filter
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- Research (65) Apply Research filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (61) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Self-Help Centers (59) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Strategic Planning (53) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (52) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Courts (46) Apply Courts filter
- Reports (40) Apply Reports filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (28) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Articles & SRLN Briefs (25) Apply Articles & SRLN Briefs filter
- Allied Professionals (24) Apply Allied Professionals filter
- Ethics Education (23) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Unbundling (23) Apply Unbundling filter
- Simplification (21) Apply Simplification filter
- Judges (20) Apply Judges filter
- Legal Aid (20) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Triage (20) Apply Triage filter
- Technology (19) Apply Technology filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (18) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Private Bar (18) Apply Private Bar filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (16) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Judicial Ethics (15) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- ATJ Commissions (14) Apply ATJ Commissions filter
- Forms (14) Apply Forms filter
- Best Practices (10) Apply Best Practices filter
- Evaluation (10) Apply Evaluation filter
- Plain Language & LEP (10) Apply Plain Language & LEP filter
- Libraries (9) Apply Libraries filter
- Presentations (9) Apply Presentations filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (9) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Working Groups (9) Apply Working Groups filter
- Surveys (8) Apply Surveys filter
- Triage & Service Portal (8) Apply Triage & Service Portal filter
- Forms (7) Apply Forms filter
- Human Centered Design (7) Apply Human Centered Design filter
- Map Gallery (7) Apply Map Gallery filter
- Plain Language (7) Apply Plain Language filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (7) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Funding (6) Apply Funding filter
- Justice for All (6) Apply Justice for All filter
- Law Schools (6) Apply Law Schools filter
- Managing a Self-Help Center (6) Apply Managing a Self-Help Center filter
- Attorney Ethics (5) Apply Attorney Ethics filter
- Constitutional Issues (5) Apply Constitutional Issues filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (5) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services (5) Apply Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services filter
- Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics (4) Apply Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics filter
- Conferences & Summits (4) Apply Conferences & Summits filter
- Consumer Adoption (4) Apply Consumer Adoption filter
- LEP and Access (4) Apply LEP and Access filter
State
- California (21) Apply California filter
- Alaska (8) Apply Alaska filter
- Florida (8) Apply Florida filter
- Maryland (8) Apply Maryland filter
- Washington (6) Apply Washington filter
- Illinois (5) Apply Illinois filter
- Colorado (4) Apply Colorado filter
- New York (4) Apply New York filter
- Utah (4) Apply Utah filter
- Indiana (2) Apply Indiana filter
- Massachusetts (2) Apply Massachusetts filter
- Michigan (2) Apply Michigan filter
- Minnesota (2) Apply Minnesota filter
- North Carolina (2) Apply North Carolina filter
- Pennsylvania (2) Apply Pennsylvania filter
- Texas (2) Apply Texas filter
- Virginia (2) Apply Virginia filter
- Arkansas (1) Apply Arkansas filter
- Delaware (1) Apply Delaware filter
- Hawaii (1) Apply Hawaii filter
- Idaho (1) Apply Idaho filter
- Kentucky (1) Apply Kentucky filter
- Louisiana (1) Apply Louisiana filter
- Missouri (1) Apply Missouri filter
- Montana (1) Apply Montana filter
- Nebraska (1) Apply Nebraska filter
- New Jersey (1) Apply New Jersey filter
- New Mexico (1) Apply New Mexico filter
- North Dakota (1) Apply North Dakota filter
- Ohio (1) Apply Ohio filter
- Oregon (1) Apply Oregon filter
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Search results

Report: Civil Justice for All (American Academy of Arts & Sciences 2020)
Civil Justice for All is the final report of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences initaitive, Making Justice Accessible: Designing Legal Services for the 21st Century. The project assessed the consequences of the justice gap, reviewed existing civi ...

Video: The Civil Justice Gap (American Academy of Arts & Sciences 2020)
The Academy produced this short video, defining the civil justice gap, to support the work of the Making Justice Accessible initiative and the release of its final report, Civil Justice for All. Run time: 4 minutes 45 seconds. Recommended citation: Ameri ...

Report: Measuring Civil Justice for All (American Academy of Arts & Sciences 2021)
Measuring Civil Justice for All, a white paper of the American Academy’s Making Justice Accessible initiative, identifies the essential facts that should be collected about civil justice activity in the United States and the entities best placed to collec ...

Report: Justice Tech for All How Technology can Ethically Disrupt the US Justice System (Village Capital & AmFam Institute 2021)
Village Capital and American Family Insurance Institute for Corporate and Social Impact (AmFam Institute) prepared this report to support justice tech efforts and initiatives. From the report: In September 2020, Village Capital and the AmFam Institute con ...

SRLN Brief: Rule 6.5- A Powerful Tool to Diversify Pro Bono and Transform Court Services (SRLN 2015)
Ethics rule 6.5 is a powerful tool to diversify pro bono programs and to transform court services because it allows unbundled lawyers to perform real time services in court-annexed programs without the onerous clerical burdens and limitations under the tr ...

Report: Designing for Housing Stability: Best Practices for Court-Based and Court-Adjacent Eviction Prevention and/or Diversion Programs (Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program and American Bar Association 2021)
Designing for Housing Stability: Best Practices for Court-Based and Court-Adjacent Eviction Prevention and/or Diversion Programs (Joint Report of the Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program and American Bar Association 2021) The Task Force on ...

Report: Access to Justice Commissions: Increasing Effectiveness Through Adequate Staffing and Funding (Flynn 2018)
This report is intended to help access to justice commissions take advantage of the high visibility of the commission movement and the many successful commission initiatives across the country. By leveraging this general level of support into ongoing stab ...

Report: Social Work Practices in California Legal Aid Organizations (OneJustice and The Legal Aid Association of California 2021)
This report seeks to illuminate one particular aspect of the legal aid landscape: the confluence of social work services and civil legal services, which can often be siloed into separate and fragmented service delivery systems. The idea of removing the bo ...

Resolution: In Support of Continuing Efforts to Meet Civil Legal Needs (CCJ/COSCA 2021)
In February of 2021, the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators adopted Resolution 2 In Support of Continuing Efforts to Meet Civil Legal Needs. After extensive findings setting out the need, especially during the CO ...

Resource: Guiding Principles for Post-Pandemic Court Technology (CCJ/COSCA 2020)
The Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) and Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA) published these Guiding Principles for Post-Pandemic Court Technology on July 16, 2020 with the goal to better guide state courts as they moved services to remote ...