Document Author
Year Published
Topic
- (-) Remove Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter Best Practices for Self-Help Centers
- (-) Remove Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter Justice Tech Entrepreneurs
- 100% Access to Justice (2) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Self-Help Centers (2) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (2) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Administrative Agencies (1) Apply Administrative Agencies filter
- Consumer Adoption (1) Apply Consumer Adoption filter
- Courts (1) Apply Courts filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (1) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Legal Aid (1) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Libraries (1) Apply Libraries filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Remote (1) Apply Remote filter
- Reports (1) Apply Reports filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (1) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (1) Apply Research filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (1) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (1) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Strategic Planning (1) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Technology (1) Apply Technology filter
- Unbundling (1) Apply Unbundling filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
Tags
Post date
Results 1 - 2 of 2 for Justice Tech Entrepreneurs, 2016, Best Practices for Self-Help Centers
Search results
Article: Creating a User-Friendly Court Structure and Environment (NACM 2016)
This publication, from the National Association for Court Management (NACM), encourages the reader to this how the court environment- from the building, to the people, to the technology and resources- can be responsive to the needs and comfort of the publ ...
Resource: Resource Guide on Serving Self-Represented Litigants Remotely (SRLN 2016)
The Resource Guide provides options for courts and other entities interested in providing services to self-represented litigants using means that are not face-to-face, instead of, or in addition to, in-person alternatives such as walk-in services, worksho ...