Document Author
Year Published
- 2015 (8) Apply 2015 filter
- 2016 (5) Apply 2016 filter
- 2013 (3) Apply 2013 filter
- 2008 (2) Apply 2008 filter
- 2014 (2) Apply 2014 filter
- 1995 (1) Apply 1995 filter
- 2000 (1) Apply 2000 filter
- 2005 (1) Apply 2005 filter
- 2007 (1) Apply 2007 filter
- 2010 (1) Apply 2010 filter
- 2011 (1) Apply 2011 filter
- 2014; 2017 (1) Apply 2014; 2017 filter
- 2017 (1) Apply 2017 filter
- 2021 (1) Apply 2021 filter
Topic
- (-) Remove Courts filter Courts
- (-) Remove Self-Help Centers filter Self-Help Centers
- 100% Access to Justice (27) Apply 100% Access to Justice filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (25) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (13) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (13) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Research (13) Apply Research filter
- Reports (11) Apply Reports filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (9) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Legal Aid (9) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Strategic Planning (9) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Allied Professionals (7) Apply Allied Professionals filter
- Simplification (6) Apply Simplification filter
- Private Bar (5) Apply Private Bar filter
- Articles & SRLN Briefs (4) Apply Articles & SRLN Briefs filter
- Ethics Education (4) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Evaluation (4) Apply Evaluation filter
- Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics (3) Apply Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics filter
- Funding (3) Apply Funding filter
- Judges (3) Apply Judges filter
- Managing a Self-Help Center (3) Apply Managing a Self-Help Center filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (3) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Triage (3) Apply Triage filter
- Unbundling (3) Apply Unbundling filter
- Attorney Ethics (2) Apply Attorney Ethics filter
- Evaluating a Self-Help Center (2) Apply Evaluating a Self-Help Center filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (2) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (2) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Libraries (2) Apply Libraries filter
- Surveys (2) Apply Surveys filter
- Technology (2) Apply Technology filter
- Administrative Agencies (1) Apply Administrative Agencies filter
- ATJ Commissions (1) Apply ATJ Commissions filter
- Automated Forms & E-Filing (1) Apply Automated Forms & E-Filing filter
- Forms (1) Apply Forms filter
- Funding Strategies (1) Apply Funding Strategies filter
- Judicial Ethics (1) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- Plain Language (1) Apply Plain Language filter
- Plain Language & LEP (1) Apply Plain Language & LEP filter
- Presentations (1) Apply Presentations filter
- Regulatory Concerns (1) Apply Regulatory Concerns filter
- Remote (1) Apply Remote filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (1) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Triage & Service Portal (1) Apply Triage & Service Portal filter
- Webinars (1) Apply Webinars filter
- Working Groups (1) Apply Working Groups filter
State
- California (7) Apply California filter
- Alaska (3) Apply Alaska filter
- Maryland (3) Apply Maryland filter
- New York (2) Apply New York filter
- Utah (2) Apply Utah filter
- Florida (1) Apply Florida filter
- Idaho (1) Apply Idaho filter
- Minnesota (1) Apply Minnesota filter
- Montana (1) Apply Montana filter
- Washington (1) Apply Washington filter
Tags
Post date
Search results
Weblinks: Simplification in Singapore (State Court of Singapore 2015)
Transparent information that seeks user feedback from the State Courts of Singapore about what a simplified court process means for SRLs in criminal, SRLs in civil, lawyers and others that can be found on the Singapore State Court's Key Features of t ...
Weblinks: Elkins Family Law Task Force & Implementation Task Force (Judicial Branch of California 2010, 2013)
In Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337, the California court recommended that the Judicial Council of California establish a task force to “study and propose measures to assist trial courts in achieving efficiency and fairness in marital d ...
Resource: Title IV-D Funding Resource Guide (SRLN 2014, revised 2017)
Many state court systems and individual courts take advantage of federal funding under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act to obtain reimbursement for the costs of adjudicating child support and paternity matters when hearings are handled by persons oth ...
Website: California Court-Legal Aid Partnership Grants (Legal Services Trust Fund Commission 2015)
Each year ten percent of the California's Equal Access Funds allocation is distributed by the Legal Services Trust Fund Commission as Partnership Grants. This funding is available for joint projects of courts and legal services programs to make legal ...
Report: California Courts Self-Help Centers: Report to the Legislature (California 2007)
This is a report, found at http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/rpt_leg_self_help.pdf, on the implementation of California's Statewide Action Plan for Self-Represented Litigants. It includes detailed financial and collaboration information in response ...
Survey: SRLN Tiers of Service Survey Tool (SRLN 2015)
The SRLN Tiers Survey was developed for states to conduct a quick tiered inventory of their court based self-help services. Tier 1 services are asynchronous (one-way), Tier 2 services are synchronous (two-way), and Tier 3 services integrate multiple provi ...
Report: Making Self-Help Work: Bet Tzedek’s Conservatorship Clinic (Bet Tzedek 2013)
Since 2007, Bet Tzedek Legal Services has been running a self-help conservatorship clinic in partnership with the Los Angeles Superior Court. Originally designed to serve 150 self-represented litigants per year, the program served more than 1,400 self-re ...
SRLN Brief: Rule 6.5- A Powerful Tool to Diversify Pro Bono and Transform Court Services (SRLN 2015)
Ethics rule 6.5 is a powerful tool to diversify pro bono programs and to transform court services because it allows unbundled lawyers to perform real time services in court-annexed programs without the onerous clerical burdens and limitations under the tr ...
Article: Faster, Cheaper & As Satisfying: An Evaluation of Alaska’s Early Resolution Triage Program (Marz 2016)
The Alaska Court System, in partnership with the Alaska Pro Bono Program, created the Early Resolution Program (ERP) to address many issues with which courts across the country are grappling: how to efficiently and effectively manage divorce and custody c ...
Article: Ensuring Access to Justice in Tough Economic Times (Broccolina & Zorza 2008)
This article outlines seven suggestions for the courts which require relatively small or easily found upfront investment and minor ongoing expenditures. This article first appeared in the November-December 2008 (Volume 92, Number 3) of JUDICATURE, the Jou ...