Document Author
Year Published
- 2015 (29) Apply 2015 filter
- 2013 (18) Apply 2013 filter
- 2016 (18) Apply 2016 filter
- 2021 (13) Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 (11) Apply 2020 filter
- 2014 (10) Apply 2014 filter
- 2017 (8) Apply 2017 filter
- 2018 (8) Apply 2018 filter
- 2011 (6) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (5) Apply 2010 filter
- 2012 (5) Apply 2012 filter
- 2003 (4) Apply 2003 filter
- 2005 (4) Apply 2005 filter
- 2007 (4) Apply 2007 filter
- 2008 (4) Apply 2008 filter
- 2009 (3) Apply 2009 filter
- 2000 (2) Apply 2000 filter
- 2004 (2) Apply 2004 filter
- 2019 (2) Apply 2019 filter
- 1975 (1) Apply 1975 filter
- 1988 (1) Apply 1988 filter
- 1995 (1) Apply 1995 filter
- 1999 (1) Apply 1999 filter
- 2002 (1) Apply 2002 filter
- 2014; 2017 (1) Apply 2014; 2017 filter
- 2023 (1) Apply 2023 filter
- SRLN (1) Apply SRLN filter
Topic
- (-) Remove 100% Access to Justice filter 100% Access to Justice
- Research (65) Apply Research filter
- Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys (61) Apply Reports, Evaluations, Best Practices, Surveys filter
- Self-Help Centers (59) Apply Self-Help Centers filter
- Strategic Planning (53) Apply Strategic Planning filter
- Trial Court Self-Help (52) Apply Trial Court Self-Help filter
- Courts (46) Apply Courts filter
- Reports (40) Apply Reports filter
- Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services (28) Apply Linking a Self-Help Center to Other Services filter
- Articles & SRLN Briefs (25) Apply Articles & SRLN Briefs filter
- Allied Professionals (24) Apply Allied Professionals filter
- Ethics Education (23) Apply Ethics Education filter
- Unbundling (23) Apply Unbundling filter
- Simplification (21) Apply Simplification filter
- Judges (20) Apply Judges filter
- Legal Aid (20) Apply Legal Aid filter
- Triage (20) Apply Triage filter
- Technology (19) Apply Technology filter
- Best Practices for Self-Help Centers (18) Apply Best Practices for Self-Help Centers filter
- Private Bar (18) Apply Private Bar filter
- Justice Tech Entrepreneurs (16) Apply Justice Tech Entrepreneurs filter
- Judicial Ethics (15) Apply Judicial Ethics filter
- ATJ Commissions (14) Apply ATJ Commissions filter
- Forms (14) Apply Forms filter
- Best Practices (10) Apply Best Practices filter
- Evaluation (10) Apply Evaluation filter
- Plain Language & LEP (10) Apply Plain Language & LEP filter
- Libraries (9) Apply Libraries filter
- Presentations (9) Apply Presentations filter
- Starting a Self-Help Center (9) Apply Starting a Self-Help Center filter
- Working Groups (9) Apply Working Groups filter
- Surveys (8) Apply Surveys filter
- Triage & Service Portal (8) Apply Triage & Service Portal filter
- Forms (7) Apply Forms filter
- Human Centered Design (7) Apply Human Centered Design filter
- Map Gallery (7) Apply Map Gallery filter
- Plain Language (7) Apply Plain Language filter
- Scaling in Court Systems (7) Apply Scaling in Court Systems filter
- Funding (6) Apply Funding filter
- Justice for All (6) Apply Justice for All filter
- Law Schools (6) Apply Law Schools filter
- Managing a Self-Help Center (6) Apply Managing a Self-Help Center filter
- Attorney Ethics (5) Apply Attorney Ethics filter
- Constitutional Issues (5) Apply Constitutional Issues filter
- Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency (5) Apply Impact of Self-Represented Litigant Innovations on Cost and Efficiency filter
- Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services (5) Apply Tools for Evaluating Self-Help Programs and Services filter
- Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics (4) Apply Clerk, Self-Help Center Staff, and Librarian Ethics filter
- Conferences & Summits (4) Apply Conferences & Summits filter
- Consumer Adoption (4) Apply Consumer Adoption filter
- LEP and Access (4) Apply LEP and Access filter
State
- California (21) Apply California filter
- Alaska (8) Apply Alaska filter
- Florida (8) Apply Florida filter
- Maryland (8) Apply Maryland filter
- Washington (6) Apply Washington filter
- Illinois (5) Apply Illinois filter
- Colorado (4) Apply Colorado filter
- New York (4) Apply New York filter
- Utah (4) Apply Utah filter
- Indiana (2) Apply Indiana filter
- Massachusetts (2) Apply Massachusetts filter
- Michigan (2) Apply Michigan filter
- Minnesota (2) Apply Minnesota filter
- North Carolina (2) Apply North Carolina filter
- Pennsylvania (2) Apply Pennsylvania filter
- Texas (2) Apply Texas filter
- Virginia (2) Apply Virginia filter
- Arkansas (1) Apply Arkansas filter
- Delaware (1) Apply Delaware filter
- Hawaii (1) Apply Hawaii filter
- Idaho (1) Apply Idaho filter
- Kentucky (1) Apply Kentucky filter
- Louisiana (1) Apply Louisiana filter
- Missouri (1) Apply Missouri filter
- Montana (1) Apply Montana filter
- Nebraska (1) Apply Nebraska filter
- New Jersey (1) Apply New Jersey filter
- New Mexico (1) Apply New Mexico filter
- North Dakota (1) Apply North Dakota filter
- Ohio (1) Apply Ohio filter
- Oregon (1) Apply Oregon filter
Region
- (-) Remove United States filter United States
Tags
Post date
Search results
Report: Using the Internet to Facilitate Enrollment in Benefits Programs: Eligibility Screeners and Online Applications (Center for Budget and Policy Priorities 2005)
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ Project on Program Simplification and Coordination conducts research and analysis on how benefit program rules can be simplified and better integrated across programs. The project also provides technical assista ...
Report: A Report and Analysis of Action Plans throughout California (California 2003)
This June 2003 report analyzes pro se court action plans from county courts throughout California, examining court program needs assessments and program designs as well as the community partnerships which were integral to plan development in each county. ...

SRLN Brief: Memo on Model Code of Judicial Conduct 2.2 Revisions (SRLN 2012)
This memorandum lays out ways that states can develop state-specific comment language for their judicial codes. The memo reflects recent research, as well as recent state developments as of date of publishing. Judges Judicial Ethics United States SRLN Mem ...
Survey/Report: Self-Represented Litigation in Nebraska: Survey of Judges and Clerks (Nebraska 2015)
This is a joint project of the Nebraska Supreme Court Committee on Self-Represented Litigants and Nebraska Legal Aid that surveys judges and clerks about self-representation. Strategic Planning Reports Surveys Nebraska United States Self Represented Litig ...
Report: NCSC Judicial Conduct Reporter (Gray 2014)
This issue of the Judicial Conduct Reporter includes an indepth look at how states are addressing the ethics issues posed by self-represented litigants, including a review of case law and Judicial Code of Ethics 2.2. 2.2 Judges Reports Judicial Ethics Uni ...

Report: Securing Stability: Legal Aid's Lasting Impact (The Center for Community Solutions 2019)
Legal Aid Society of Cleveland and Community Legal Aid teamed up to hire The Center for Community Solutions (CCS) to survey former clients of the two non-profit law firms. Of the 1,250 individuals from 13 counties in Northeast Ohio who responded more than ...

Maryland Centralizes District and Circuit Court Self-Help While Expanding Phone and Mobile Support (News 2016)
After unifying its statewide self-help support services into a single call line and support center, the Maryland court system’s new Maryland Self-Help Center expects to at least double the number of litigants it has previously helped while also expanding ...

Pittsburgh Court Doubles the Number of Self-Represented Litigants Served In First Three Months With No-Cost Reengineering Initiative (News 2016)
In Pittsburgh, reengineering was the key to serving Self-Represented Litigants (SRLs), resulting in the opening of the court’s Family Division Self-Help Center (SHC), which doubled the number of customers served while offering a more sophisticated set o ...
Paper: Courts Need to Provide Access to Justice in Rural America (COSCA 2018)
In a detailed policy paper entitled, Courts Need to Provide Access to Justice in Rural America, and published in 2018 by the Conference of State Court Administrators, readers will find a thoughtful analysis of how rural courts can expand access and suppor ...
Paper: How Fair, Fast, and Cheap Should Courts Be? (Greacen 1999)
Making the court system fairer, faster, and cheaper are at the top of most agendas for restoring public trust and confidence in the legal system. But how much fairer, faster, and cheaper do the courts need to be to meet the public's needs? So long as ...